PREDICTION OF BY-PRODUCT FORMATION DURING CHLORINE DIOXIDE DISINFECTION: FROM STATISTICAL TO HYBRID MODELS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/2218-930012026359443

Keywords:

drinking water treatment, chlorine dioxide disinfection, chlorite formation, disinfection byproducts, adaptive dosing, response surface methodology, hybrid models

Abstract

Safe drinking water supply remains one of the most critical humanitarian challenges facing Ukraine amid ongoing armed conflict. Destruction of water infrastructure, combined with deteriorating source water quality has created an urgent need for adaptive, scientifically grounded disinfection management tools. Chlorine dioxide offers significant advantages over conventional chlorination, including efficacy across a wide pH range, biofilm disruption capacity and absence of carcinogenic trihalomethanes. However, chlorine dioxide disinfection generates specific oxidation byproducts (primarily chlorites and chlorates) whose combined concentration is strictly limited under national and European regulations, creating a fundamental technological paradox between guaranteed pathogen inactivation and byproduct minimization. Presented study develops an integrated computer modelling framework for chlorine dioxide disinfection byproduct prediction and control. A hybrid model architecture was proposed as the foundation for an adaptive SCADA-integrated dosing system capable of real-time chlorine dioxide adjustment based on continuous water quality sensor inputs. A five-factor central composite rotatable design (pH, temperature, chlorine dioxide dose, contact time, total organic carbon) was implemented to build second-order polynomial response surface models for two target responses: the fraction of consumed chlorine dioxide as a measure of disinfection efficiency and chlorite concentration in treated water. Analysis of regression equations revealed the pH as the dominant factor controlling chlorite formation, with the free term of the chlorite formation model approaching the regulatory limit at average operating conditions, confirming that passive parameter maintenance cannot guarantee regulatory compliance. Multi-criteria optimization using the Harrington desirability function identified the optimal operating regime: pH 6.0, temperature 25 °C, chlorine dioxide dose 6.0 mg/dm3, contact time 18.2 hours, TOC ≤ 10 mg/dm3. A Pareto frontier analysis structured the full set of optimal trade-off solutions into three operational modes, providing water utilities with a flexible decision-making tool adaptable to current epidemiological priorities. Monte Carlo stochastic simulation quantified seasonal risk differentiation, demonstrating that pH reduction is a more effective control lever than dose reduction for maintaining chlorite compliance under summer source water conditions.

References

Antony, J. 2023. Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists, 3rd ed.; Elsevier.

Bondarchuk, O. V.; Shakhnovsky, A. M.; Spasonova, L. M.; Mokiienko, A. V. 2025. Water Disinfection with Chlorine Dioxide: Experimental-Statistical Modeling. In Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal: Design, Construction, Operation, Monitoring; Malovanyi, M. S., Ed.; NGO “MNG”: Kyiv, Ukraine; pp 121–136.

Bondarchuk, O.; Spasonova, L.; Shakhnovsky, A.; Kvitka, O. 2026. Study of Water Treatment Processes with Chlorine Dioxide: 1. Experimental Design. Herald Khmelnytskyi Natl. Univ., Tech. Sci. 363 (2), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5732-2026-363-32

de Brito Cruz, D.; Schmidt, P. J.; Emelko, M. B. 2024. Drinking Water QMRA and Decision-Making: Sensitivity of Risk to Common Independence Assumptions about Model Inputs. Water Res. 259, 121877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121877

Di Bella, A.; Raissi, M.; et al. 2026. Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Water and Wastewater Systems: A Critical Review. Water Res. 293, 125449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2026.125449

Ding, Y.; Sun, Q.; et al. 2024. Application of Artificial Intelligence in (Waste)Water Disinfection: Emphasizing the Regulation of Disinfection By-Products Formation and Residues Prediction. Water Res. 253, 121267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121267

El Houda Mellal, N.; Tahar, W.; et al. 2024. Prediction of Purified Water Quality in Industrial Hydrocarbon Wastewater Treatment Using an Artificial Neural Network and Response Surface Methodology. J. Water Process Eng. 58, 104757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104757

Hapich, H.; Novitskyi, R.; et al. 2024. Water Security Consequences of the Russia–Ukraine War and the Post-War Outlook. Water Secur. 21, 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2024.100167

Harrington, G. W.; et al. 1992. Developing a Computer Model to Simulate DBP Formation during Water Treatment. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 84 (11), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1992.tb05886.x

Hu, G.; Mian, H. R.; et al. 2023. Appraisal of Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Emerging Disinfection Byproducts in Small Water Distribution Networks. J. Hazard. Mater. 446, 130633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130633

Korn, C.; Andrews, R. C.; Escobar, M. D. 2002. Development of Chlorine Dioxide-Related By-Product Models for Drinking Water Treatment. Water Res. 36 (1), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00194-4

Li, Y.; Chen, J.; et al. 2024. Degradation of the Novel Herbicide Tiafenacil in Aqueous Solution: Kinetics, Various Influencing Factors, Hydrolysis Products Identification, and Toxicity Assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 952, 175937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175937

Ma, Y.; Zhang, X.; et al. 2025. Simultaneous Control of Chlorite and Micropollutants in Drinking Water through Far-UVC Photolysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59 (48), 26229–26237. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c08408

McKelvey, S.; Cheng, Z.; et al. 2025. Assessment of Regulated and Unregulated Disinfection Byproduct Formation Using Chlorine Dioxide Pre-Oxidation in Pilot Studies and Data-Driven Modeling. J. Hazard. Mater. 497, 139729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139729

Moeini, M.; Abokifa, A. A. 2025. Physics-Informed Ensemble Machine Learning for Dynamic Water Quality Prediction in Water Distribution Systems. J. Water Process Eng. 79, 108841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.108841

Mokiienko, A. V. 2025a. Chlorine Dioxide. Vol. 1: Chemistry; National University of Ostroh Academy: Ostroh, Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)

Mokiienko, A. V. 2025b. Chlorine Dioxide. Vol. 2: Microbiology; National University of Ostroh Academy: Ostroh, Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)

Mokiienko, A. V. 2026. Chlorine Dioxide. Vol. 3: Toxicology; National University of Ostroh Academy: Ostroh, Ukraine. (in Ukrainian)

Shumilova, O.; Tockner, K.; et al. 2023. Impact of the Russia–Ukraine Armed Conflict on Water Resources and Water Infrastructure. Nat. Sustain. 6, 578–586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01068-x

Song, B.; Yang, H.; et al. 2023. Disinfection Byproducts Formed from Oxidation of Pesticide Micropollutants in Water: Precursor Sources, Reaction Kinetics, Formation, Influencing Factors, and Toxicity. Chem. Eng. J. 475, 146310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.146310

Sorlini, S.; Biasibetti, M.; et al. 2016. Modeling and Analysis of Chlorine Dioxide, Chlorite, and Chlorate Propagation in a Drinking Water Distribution System. J. Water Supply Res. Technol.–AQUA 65 (8), 597–611.

Sorlini, S.; Collivignarelli, C. 2005. Chlorite Removal with Granular Activated Carbon. Desalination 176 (1–3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.10.030

Sorlini, S.; Gialdini, F.; et al. 2014. Influence of Drinking Water Treatments on Chlorine Dioxide Consumption and Chlorite/Chlorate Formation. Water Res. 54, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.038

Strokal, V.; Kurovska, A.; Strokal, M. 2023. More River Pollution from Untreated Urban Waste Due to the Russian–Ukrainian War: A Perspective View. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2023.2281920

Suquet, J.; Godo-Pla, L.; et al. 2021. Assessing the Effect of Catchment Characteristics to Enhanced Coagulation in Drinking Water Treatment: RSM Models and Sensitivity Analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 799, 149398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149398

Zalenska, Y. 2023. Surface Water Quality Assessment for Irrigation Using Harrington’s Desirability Function. Probl. Khim. Stal. Rozv. 8, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.32782/pcsd-2023-2-5 (in Ukrainian)

Zanetti, M.; Godio, A.; et al. 2008. Chlorine Dioxide By-Products Predictive Models for Drinking Water Oxidation Treatment. Water Sci. Technol.: Water Supply 8 (3), 331–338. URL: https://www.academia.edu/108208653/Chlorine_dioxide_by_products_predictive_models_for_drinking_water_oxidation_treatment

Zhang, R.; Lin, Z.; et al. 2025. An In-Situ Strategy of Modified Biochar–Activated Persulfate for Low-Temperature Livestock Wastewater Treatment: Dynamic Reaction Kinetics and Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Multi-Unit Structure Reactor Design. Chem. Eng. Process. 216, 110412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2025.110412

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Bondarchuk, O., Shakhnovsky, A., Spasonova, L., & Mokiienko, A. (2026). PREDICTION OF BY-PRODUCT FORMATION DURING CHLORINE DIOXIDE DISINFECTION: FROM STATISTICAL TO HYBRID MODELS. Water & Water Purification Technologies. Scientific and Technical News, 44(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.20535/2218-930012026359443

Issue

Section

MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION