OPTIMIZATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT BIOTECHNOLOGY USING A MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20535/2218-930032024327505Keywords:
biotechnology, wastewater, biological wastewater treatment, membrane bioreactor, optimizationAbstract
The growing environmental concerns associated with elevated levels of ammonium nitrogen in municipal wastewater, along with increasingly stringent discharge regulations, necessitate the development and implementation of advanced and highly efficient treatment technologies. This study is aimed at optimizing the operational parameters of a membrane bioreactor system for urban wastewater treatment, focusing on the balance between treatment performance and operational sustainability. Membrane bioreactor systems offer several key advantages over conventional biological treatment methods, including higher biomass retention, improved effluent quality, compact system design, and the ability to support simultaneous nitrification and denitrification processes within a single reactor. To investigate optimal operating conditions, GPS-X simulation software was used to model 36 combinations of filtration duration and washing duration over a 10-day dynamic period. The impact of these parameters on critical performance indicators – transmembrane pressure, hydraulic load, hydraulic permeability, nitrogen removal efficiency, and washwater consumption – was assessed. The simulations demonstrated that the optimal operating regime involved a filtration duration of 30 minutes combined with a washing duration of 180 seconds. Under these conditions, transmembrane pressure was minimized (1,586 kPa), while ammonium and nitrate nitrogen concentrations in the treated effluent were effectively reduced to 0.13 mg N/L and 11.36 mg N/L, respectively – well below the regulatory limits for discharge. Additionally, the system exhibited favorable hydraulic permeability (0.3635 m³/(m²·kPa·day)) and moderate washwater usage (13.1 m³/day), contributing to operational cost efficiency and membrane longevity. These results not only confirm the suitability of membrane bioreactor technology for nutrient removal but also emphasize its practical potential for municipal implementation in Ukraine. The study highlights the role of simulation-based optimization in achieving both environmental compliance and resource-efficient operation, reinforcing the relevance of membrane bioreactor systems as a core component of modern wastewater management strategies.
References
Sablii, L.; Bunchak, O.; Zhukova, V.; Workshop on biotechnology of water treatment: a textbook: a textbook for students of specialty 162 “Biotechnology and bioengineering”, 2021.
Khrystenko, A. M. Operation of biological wastewater treatment facilities using membrane technologies: PhD thesis in architecture: 192, 2023.
Smith, C.W.; Di Gregorio D.; Talcott, R.M. The Use of Ultrafiltration Membrane for Activated Sludge Separation. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Purdue Industrial Waste Conference, West Lafayette, 1969, pp 1300-1310.
Enegess, D.; Togna, A. P.; Sutton, P. M. Membrane separation applications to biosystems for wastewater treatment. Filtration & Separation 2003, 40 (1), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-1882(03)80092-7
Yamamoto, K.; Hiasa, M.; Mahmood, T.; Matsuo, T. Direct Solid-Liquid Separation Using Hollow Fiber Membrane in an Activated Sludge Aeration Tank. Water Science and Technology 1989, 21 (4-5), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1989.0209
Alnaizy, R.; Abdel-Jabbar, N.; Aidan, A.; Abachi, N. Modeling and dynamic analysis of a membrane bioreactor with backwash scheduling. Desalination and Water Treatment 2012, 41 (1-3), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.664713
Aidan, A.; Abdel-Jabbar, N.; Ibrahim, T. H.; Nenov, V.; Mjalli, F. Neural network modeling and optimization of scheduling backwash for membrane bioreactor. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 2007, 10 (4), 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-007-0129-0
Albasi, C.; Bessiere, Y.; Desclaux, S.; Remigy, J. C. Filtration of biological sludge by immersed hollow-fiber membranes: influence of initial permeability choice of operating conditions. Desalination 2002, 146 (1-3), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-9164(02)00527-1
Hashino, M.; Katagiri, T.; Kubota, N.; Ohmukai, Y.; Maruyama, T.; Matsuyama, H. Effect of surface roughness of hollow fiber membranes with gear-shaped structure on membrane fouling by sodium alginate. Journal of Membrane Science 2011, 366 (1-2), 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.025
Bouhabila, E. Fouling characterisation in membrane bioreactors. Separation and Purification Technology 2001, 22-23 (1-2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1383-5866(00)00156-8
Hirani, Z. M.; DeCarolis, J. F.; Adham, S. S.; Jacangelo, J. G. Peak flux performance and microbial removal by selected membrane bioreactor systems. Water Research 2010, 44 (8), 2431–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.01.003
Ivanovic, I.; Leiknes, T. Impact of aeration rates on particle colloidal fraction in the biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR). Desalination 2008, 231 (1-3), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.11.046
Jiang, T.; Kennedy, M. D.; van der Meer, W. G. J.; Vanrolleghem, P. A.; Schippers, J. C. The role of blocking and cake filtration in MBR fouling. Desalination 2003, 157 (1-3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0011-9164(03)00414-4
Jiang, T.; Kennedy, M. D.; Guinzbourg, B. F.; Vanrolleghem, P. A.; Schippers, J. C. Optimising the operation of a MBR pilot plant by quantitative analysis of the membrane fouling mechanism. Water Science and Technology 2005, 51 (6-7), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2005.0617
Ngo, H.-H.; Guo, W. Membrane fouling control and enhanced phosphorus removal in an aerated submerged membrane bioreactor using modified green bioflocculant. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100 (18), 4289–4291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.057
Rosenberger, S.; Krüger, U.; Witzig, R.; Manz, W.; Szewzyk, U.; Kraume, M. Performance of a bioreactor with submerged membranes for aerobic treatment of municipal waste water. Water Research 2002, 36 (2), 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00223-8
Schoeberl, P.; Brik, M.; Bertoni, M.; Braun, R.; Fuchs, W. Optimization of operational parameters for a submerged membrane bioreactor treating dyehouse wastewater. Separation and Purification Technology 2005, 44 (1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2004.12.004
Smith, P.; Vigneswaran, S.; Ngo, H.; Benaim, R.; Nguyen, H. Design of a generic control system for optimising back flush durations in a submerged membrane hybrid reactor. Journal of Membrane Science 2005, 255 (1-2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2005.01.026
Srijaroonrat, P.; Julien, E.; Aurelle, Y. Unstable secondary oil/water emulsion treatment using ultrafiltration: fouling control by backflushing. Journal of Membrane Science 1999, 159 (1-2), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-7388(99)00044-7
Villarroel, R.; Delgado, S.; González, E.; Morales, M. Physical cleaning initiation controlled by transmembrane pressure set-point in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Separation and Purification Technology 2013, 104, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.10.047
Yigit, N. O.; Civelekoglu, G.; Harman, I.; Koseoglu, H.; Kitis, M. Effects of various backwash scenarios on membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor. Desalination 2009, 237 (1-3), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.01.026
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kyrychenko K.S., Sablii L.A.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The ownership of copyright remains with the Authors.
Authors may use their own material in other publications provided that the Journal is acknowledged as the original place of publication and National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” as the Publisher.
Authors are reminded that it is their responsibility to comply with copyright laws. It is essential to ensure that no part of the text or illustrations have appeared or are due to appear in other publications, without prior permission from the copyright holder.
WPT articles are published under Creative Commons licence:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The use of the material for commercial purposes is not permitted.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
